<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Human Security Gateway: Bosnia and Herzegovina</title>
<link><![CDATA[http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/browse.php?By=REGION&Selection=191]]></link>
<description>Items related to "Human Security Gateway: Bosnia and Herzegovina".</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 0:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 0:30:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
<webMaster>robert_hartfiel@sfu.ca (Robert Hartfiel)</webMaster>


   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 13:30:27 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>Le point sur l’épidémie de sida - Résumés par région - Amérique du Nord, Europe occidentale et Europe centrale</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=24359</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=24359</guid>
		 <description>Ce rapport contient des résumés sur les régions suivants: Etats-Unis d’Amérique et Canada, et Europe occidentale et centrale. 	   SOURCE: Nations Unies // Programme Commun Des Nations Unies Sur le VIH/SIDA</description>
	 <source>Nations Unies // Programme Commun Des Nations Unies Sur le VIH/SIDA</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 13:42:57 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>Dealing with the Past in Israel-Palestine and in the Western Balkans: Dan Bar-On meets Peace Activists from the Western Balkans</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=24166</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=24166</guid>
		 <description>Peace activists and action researchers from the Western Balkans, Israel/Palestine and Germany gathered at the Berghof Research Center in Berlin for a seminar with renowned Israeli psychologist Dan Bar-On on 14 and 15 February 2008. The workshop was organised and co-facilitated by Dr. Martina Fischer, the Center’s Acting Director, and designed for partners who are active in peacebuilding and conflict transformation in the Western Balkans. Participants came from Serbia and Bosnia-Herzegovina, in particular from the Centre for Nonviolent Action which maintains offices in Belgrade and Sarajevo and from Miramida Centre, Groznjan (Istria, Croatia). In addition to this, some German colleagues from the Bildungs- und Begegnungsstätte für
gewaltfreie Aktion – Kurve Wustrow, from the Akademie für Konflikttransformation (Forum Ziviler Friedensdienst) and from the Berghof team joined the event. Tamar Bar-On, who teaches at the Ben-Gurion University’s Department of Social Work also actively contributed to the workshop as a resource person and observer. 	   SOURCE: Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management</description>
	 <source>Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 10:49:32 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>Transitional Justice in the Former Yugoslavia</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=23713</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=23713</guid>
		 <description>Since its inception, the ICTJ has supported the work of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY). In 2002 then ICTJ President Alex Boraine testified at the unprecedented sentencing hearing in 2002 for Biljana Plavsic, former President of Republika Srpska. Boraine noted the importance of Plavsic's guilty plea and her acknowledgment of responsibility, but questioned her decision not to take the extra step of testifying about the roles of other senior Serb officials in committing war crimes. On February 12, 2002 the Trial Chamber of the ICTY began to hear the case against former Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic. The case marked the first time a head of state faced charges of genocide and crimes against humanity in an international court. It also offered a dramatic public history lesson on the catastrophe that engulfed Yugoslavia in the 1990s. To enable transparency and the widest possible audience for the trial, the ICTJ and the Human Rights Project at Bard College created an internet-based archive of the audio and video of the trial. The archive allows cross-referencing and easy movement across segments of the trial video. It is also linked to a physical archive of broadcast-quality digital videotapes of the trial, fully open to use by researchers, students, broadcasters, and members of the public. While the death of Milosevic in March 2006 meant that the ICTY was unable to issue a verdict in his trial, the case uncovered a substantial amount of documentary evidence and witness testimony that now forms part of the public record. 	   SOURCE: International Center for Transitional Justice</description>
	 <source>International Center for Transitional Justice</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 12:44:00 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>Bosnia and Herzegovina – Legitimacy in Transition</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=23378</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=23378</guid>
		 <description>The mass atrocities committed in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) in the early nineties have prompted the establishment of the first international war crimes court since the Nuremberg and Tokyo Tribunals. Ever since, the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, the court which has marked a new stage in the development of international justice, has been shaped and influenced by the events in Bosnia and Herzegovina. At the same time, its existence and achievements have hugely impacted Bosnia and Herzegovina in its ongoing post-war transition into a democratic society. This relationship resulted in a unique case of international intervention in a post-conflict context and an unprecedented transfer of legitimacy of a justice process from an international body to local institutions. 	   SOURCE: Peace Justice Conference // Working Group on Development and Peace // Center for Peacebuilding - swisspeace</description>
	 <source>Peace Justice Conference // Working Group on Development and Peace // Center for Peacebuilding - swisspeace</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 12:54:59 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>Maintaining the Process in Bosnia and Herzegovina - Coherence and Complementarity of European Union Institutions and Civil Society in the Field of Transitional Justice</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=23290</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=23290</guid>
		 <description>The central mechanisms of post-conflict transitional justice are criminal prosecutions, truth commissions, vetting, and reparations. Criminal prosecutions can be conducted by international courts and tribunals, national courts, and mixed or hybrid tribunals that combine elements of national and international law, jurisdiction, and staffing. Truth commissions vary in their mandate and methodology from more narrow fact-finding inquiries conducting analysis of evidence and documentation, to broader truth and reconciliation initiatives that incorporate victims and perpetrators through a process of public hearings.
Vetting takes an individualized approach to assessing the integrity of persons in order to determine their suitability for employment in the public and particularly the security sector, while lustration  disqualifies groups of individuals from holding public office on the basis of their membership or employment in certain organizations. Finally, reparations can be provided to victims of human rights abuse either within state-sponsored reparation programs, or by courts and other judicial bodies on an individual basis. Other forms of redress and modalities of transitional justice include restitution, apology,  memorialisation, and education. 	   SOURCE: Peace Justice Conference // Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development</description>
	 <source>Peace Justice Conference // Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 13:13:09 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>La sécurité humaine pour un siècle urbain : Défis locaux, perspectives mondiales</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=22218</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=22218</guid>
		 <description>Le produit le plus récent et le plus détaillé Ã  Ãªtre conÃ§u par securitehumaine-villes.org, cette publication s'appuie sur les travaux de 40 collaborateurs externes qui appliquent un prisme urbain Ã  des thèmes tels que les enfants et les conflits armés, la réforme des systèmes de sécurité, les armes de petit calibre et les armes légères, la stabilisation et la reconstruction, la consolidation de la paix et la promotion de la démocratie. 	   SOURCE: securitehumaine-villes.org</description>
	 <source>securitehumaine-villes.org</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:03:41 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Carte de déploiement des forces multinationales de stabilisation en Bosnie-Herzégovine</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=21514</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=21514</guid>
		 <description>Cette carte montre le déploiement des forces multinationales de stabilisation en Bosnie-Herzégovine 	   SOURCE: Opérations de paix, Université de Montréal</description>
	 <source>Opérations de paix, Université de Montréal</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:16:52 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>From Neo-Colonialism to a ‘Light Footprint Approach': Restoring the Justice System in Post - Conflict Operations</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=21443</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=21443</guid>
		 <description>The article attempts to briefly analyze state-building theories and methods, as applied to justice system reform in post-conflict scenarios. In this respect, the international authorities involved in the reconstruction process may traditionally chose between either a 'dirigiste' or a consent-based approach, which represent the essential terms of reference for past interventions. However, features common to most reconstruction missions and relatively poor results confirm the need for change in the overall strategy. This requires the international donors to focus more on the 'demand for justice' at local level than on the traditional supply of legal aid. In this respect, the articles stresses the need for effectively promoting the 'local ownership' of the reform process, without this expression being merely used by international actors as a political umbrella under which to protect themselves from potential failures. 	   SOURCE: European Conference on International Relations</description>
	 <source>European Conference on International Relations</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:35:42 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Firearms Possession and Domestic Violence in the Western Balkans: A Comparative Study of Legislation and Implementation Mechanisms</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=21335</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=21335</guid>
		 <description>The countries of the Western Balkans face high levels of violence, crime and human insecurity as a legacy
of recent conflicts, political turbulence and economic crises. The war in the former Yugoslavia increased
the proliferation and easy availability of small arms and light weapons, both legally and illegally possessed, contributing to a rise in violent behaviour not only in the public space, but also within the family. Other factors linked to the post-conflict situation and transition have also contributed to an increase in domestic violence, including economic and personal insecurity, unemployment, crime and intolerance. 	   SOURCE: South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms and Light Weapons</description>
	 <source>South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms and Light Weapons</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:17:44 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>The Bosnian Book of the Dead: Assessment of the Database (Full Report)</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=21008</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=21008</guid>
		 <description>The Bosnian Book of Dead is the outcome of the project “Population Losses, 1992-95â€,
conducted by the Research and Documentation Centre (RDC) in Sarajevo. The objective of
this project is establishing a country-wide database covering the victims of the Bosnian war.
Sources used for the BBD include witness statements8, existing electronic lists, lists from
books, reports, and press articles, names from grave tombs, newspaper memorials, other
newspapers records (single or lists), government sources, microfilms etc. More than 7,000
witnesses testified so far and in total thousands of different sources were used (personal
communication of the consultants with Mirsad TokaÄa, Sarajevo, 1 July 2006). All these
sources are summarized in the document “List of Sourcesâ€ which the authors studied as part of their
assessment. The intended coverage of the BBD database is the entire country and the entire conflict period
1992-95. The current version of the database is almost complete, meaning that marginal
numbers of cases can be probably still found and added resulting in a diminishing
improvement. It is the largest existing database on war-related deaths of both civilians and
soldiers for Bosnia. 	   SOURCE: Households in Conflict Network // University of Sussex</description>
	 <source>Households in Conflict Network // University of Sussex</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 14:05:26 -0800</pubDate>
	 <title>Srebrenica and the Politics of War Crimes: The Politics of the Srebrenica Massacre</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=1867</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=1867</guid>
		 <description>The Srebrenica massacre has played a special role in the politics of  Western treatment of  the restructuring of the former-Yugoslavia and  in Western interventionism more broadly, and it is receiving renewed attention and memorialization at its tenth anniversary in July 2005. It  is regularly cited as proof  of Serb evil and genocidal intent and helped justify a focus on punishing the Serbs and Milosevic and NATO’s 1999 war on Serbia. It has also provided important moral support for the further Western wars of  vengeance, power projection, and “liberation,â€ having shown that there is evil that the West can and must deal with forcibly. 	   SOURCE: Srebrenica Research Group</description>
	 <source>Srebrenica Research Group</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:03:52 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>Indictment Accepted in the Pasko Ljubicic Case</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=7577</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=7577</guid>
		 <description>On 21 December 2006, the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina accepted an adapted indictment against Pasko Ljubicic, which charges him with Crimes against humanity and War crimes against civilians. The indictment alleges that in the period January to July 1993 Pasko Ljubicic participated in a widespread or systematic attack on the Bosniak civilian population of the Vitez and Busovaca municipalities by Croatian Defence Council (HVO) forces.  The indictment further alleges that the Accuses was the commander of the 4th Military Police Battalion, which was active in the Central Bosnia Operative Zone (CBOZ) of the HVO.  He allegedly exercised both formal and de facto control over the members of the HVO Military Police in the CBOZ. 	   SOURCE: Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina</description>
	 <source>Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:51:17 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>Indictment Confirmed Against Sefik Alic</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=8275</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=8275</guid>
		 <description>On 31 January 2007, the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) confirmed an indictment which charges Sefik Alic with War crimes against prisoners of war. The indictment alleges that during the armed conflict on the territory of BiH and the Republic of Croatia, in the capacity of the Assistant Commander of the Hamza Battalion for Security of the 5th Corps of the Army of BiH, Sefik Alic acted contrary to the provisions of the Geneva Conventions.  According to the allegations in the indictment, the Accused, inter alia, participated in the physical and mental abuse of war prisoners, instigated their killings and failed to undertake measures to punish the perpetrators. 	   SOURCE: Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina</description>
	 <source>Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:07:37 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>NATO's Role in Democratic Reform</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=16778</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=16778</guid>
		 <description>As NATO has moved from being a primarily military alliance to seeking more political roles, it has become pertinent to consider its impact on democratisation. At first glance, it might seem incongruent even to deliberate on the democracy promotion relevance of an essentially military organisation. But, NATO's successive enlargements have often hinged on the

fulfilment of democratic preconditions in aspirant members, while technical assistance provided under the Partnership for Peace (PfP) and other programmes has increasingly focused on the reform of civil-military relations. Assessment is consequently warranted of whether NATO has come to play any positive role in

encouraging democratisation across different regions, or whether its impact on political liberalisation has been either marginal or even negative. This paper argues that support for democracy has increasingly infused NATO policies, but that the organisation's role in democracy promotion is circumscribed by strategic considerations; most often an indirect side effect of

other aims; and most relevant to the niche area of defence reform. 	   SOURCE: FundaciÃ³n para las Relaciones Internacionales y el DiÃ¡logo Exterior</description>
	 <source>FundaciÃ³n para las Relaciones Internacionales y el DiÃ¡logo Exterior</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:48:29 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>Lessons Learned and Best Practices from the Western Balkans</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=20884</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=20884</guid>
		 <description>These are the conference proceedings for the International Conference on Conflict Management and Conflict Prevention: Lessons Learned and Best Practices from the Western Balkans which was held in Stockholm 8-9 October 2003. The conference was organised by the Folke Bernadotte Academy in co-operation with the Swedish Ministry for Foreign Affairs and the Italian EU Presidency. The specific purpose was to identify lessons from three phases in the management of the conflicts in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, and Macedoniaxe2x80x94(1) the pre-agreement, shuttle-diplomacy phase, (2) the initial peace-implementation phase and (3) the present, mature implementation phase. The main focus was on those models, lessons and practices that could be universally applicable. The conference brought together key individuals with experience from negotiating and implementing the agreements that ended these violent conflicts, as well as government representatives from the region and renowned academics. The conference was attended by representatives of EU and OSCE member states, international organisations, research institutions and non-governmental organisations active in the region. These conference proceedings make the presentations and insights available to a larger audience. 	   SOURCE: Folke Bernadotte Academy</description>
	 <source>Folke Bernadotte Academy</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:48:29 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>Timeline: Bosnia-Hercegovina </title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=20907</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=20907</guid>
		 <description>This webpage provides a chronology of key events in history of Bosnia-Herzegovina from the time of its annexation to Austria-Hungary in 1908 to the present.   	   SOURCE: British Broadcasting Corporation</description>
	 <source>British Broadcasting Corporation</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:48:28 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>Indictment Against Vujadin Popovic</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=20752</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=20752</guid>
		 <description>The indictment alleges that, during the attack on the Srebrenica enclave by Bosnian Serb forces in July 1995, and the subsequent killings and executions of Bosnian Muslim men and boys, Vujadin Popovic was a Lieutenant Colonel and was the Assistant Commander for Security on the staff of the Drina Corps of the Bosnian Serb Army (&quot;VRS&quot;). He was present and on duty in the Drina Corps zone of responsibility, which included Srebrenica, Potocari, Bratunac and Zvornik, from 11 July to 31 August 1995. It is alleged that Vujadin Popovic, by virtue of his position as Assistant Commander of Security for the Drina Corps, had responsibility for dealing with Bosnian Muslim prisoners from Srebrenica from 11 July 1995 until 1 November 1995.



In the several days following the attack on Srebrenica, the VRS forces captured, detained, summarily executed, and buried over 7,000 Bosnian Muslim men and boys from the Srebrenica enclave, and forcibly transferred the Bosnian Muslim women and children out of the enclave. According to the indictment, Vujadin Popovic committed, planned, instigated, ordered and otherwise aided and abetted in the planning, preparation and execution of the charged crimes.



It is alleged that Vujadin Popovic, together with other VRS and Ministry of the Interior (&quot;MUP&quot;) officers and units as identified in this indictment, was a member of and knowingly participated in a Joint Criminal Enterprise, the common purpose of which was, inter alia: to forcibly transfer the women and children from the Srebrenica enclave to Kladanj on 12 July and 13 July 1995; and to capture, detain, summarily execute by firing squad, bury, and rebury thousands of Bosnian Muslim men and boys aged 16 to 60 from the Srebrenica enclave from 12 July 1995 until and about 19 July 1995. The implementation of this Joint Criminal Enterprise resulted in the summary execution of over 7,000 Bosnian Muslim men and boys. The indictment charges Popovic with one count of genocide, four counts of crimes against humanity, and one count of violations of the laws of war. 	   SOURCE: International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia</description>
	 <source>International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:48:28 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>Confronting Ethnic Chauvinism in a Post-War Environment: NGO's and Peace Education in Bosnia</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=20775</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=20775</guid>
		 <description>In Bosnia, as in many other post-ethnic-war situations, the period immediately after the ceasefire is

critical, the beginning of a time of mourning, recovering, rebuilding and building anew. Peace, at this

point, is tenuous. The wounds, fear and hatred are fresh; the ethnicization of the population is almost

complete. These add considerable weight to whatever tensions existed that led to the war in the first

place. In this unstable time, to avoid renewed violence, programmes and policies must be in place that

reduce the tensions, help people mourn and rebuild their lives, and which address the structures

feeding the ethnic hatred and fear that are named as both a part and a product of the war. 	   SOURCE: University of Bradford // Centre for Conflict Resolution // Department of Peace Studies</description>
	 <source>University of Bradford // Centre for Conflict Resolution // Department of Peace Studies</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:48:11 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>Indictment Against Dusko Tadic and Goran Borovnica</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=20496</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=20496</guid>
		 <description>Beginning on about 23 May 1992, Serb forces, supported by artillery and heavy weapons, attacked Bosnian Muslim and Croat population centres in opstina Prijedor, Bosnia-Herzegovina. In the following days, most of the Muslims and Croats were forced from their homes and seized by the Serb forces. The Serb forces then unlawfully confined thousands of Muslims and Croats in the Omarska, Keraterm and Trnopolje camps. The accused, Dusko Tadic a/k/a &quot;Dule&quot; a/k/a &quot;Dusan&quot;, participated in the attack on, seizure, murder and maltreatment of Bosnian Muslims and Croats in opstina Prijedor both within the camps and outside the camps, between the period beginning about 23 May 1992 and ending about 31 December 1992. The accused, Goran Borovnica, participated with Dusko Tadic in the killing of Bosnian Muslims in the Kozarac area, as set forth below: 	   SOURCE: International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia</description>
	 <source>International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:48:11 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>Indictment Against Dusko Sikirika, Damir Dosen, Dusan Fustar, Dragan Kolundzija, Nenad Banovic, Predrag Banovic, and Dusko Knezevic</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=20497</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=20497</guid>
		 <description>Between 24 May 1992 and 30 August 1992, Dusko Sikirica, instigated, committed or otherwise aided and abetted the killing of Bosnian Muslims and Bosnian Croats, causing serious bodily or mental harm to Bosnian Muslims and Bosnian Croats, and deliberately inflicting on the Bosnian Muslims and Bosnian Croats conditions of life calculated to bring about the physical destruction of a part of the Bosnian Muslim and Bosnian Croat populations, with the intent to destroy the Bosnian Muslims and Bosnian Croats, in part, as national, ethnic or religious groups. Dusko SIKIRICA participated in th#e above acts through his direct participation in such acts and through his instigation, approval, encouragement, acquiescence, and assistance in the development and continuation of the conditions in the camp and the on-going commission of crimes against the prisoners in the Keraterm camp. 	   SOURCE: International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia</description>
	 <source>International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:48:11 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>Indictment Against Goran Jelesic and Ranko Cesic</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=20498</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=20498</guid>
		 <description>In May 1992, Goran JELISIC, intending to destroy a substantial or significant part of the Bosnian Muslim people as a national, ethnical, or religious group, systematically killed Muslim detainees at the Laser Bus Co., the Brcko police station and Luka camp. He introduced himself as the &quot;Serb Adolf&quot;, said that he had come to Brcko to kill Muslims, and often informed the Muslim detainees and others of the number of Muslims he had killed. On about 5 May 1992, Ranko CESIC went to the Brcko Partizan Sports Hall where Muslim civilians were being confined, and took the Muslim detainee Sakib Becirevic (a/k/a Kibe) and four other men named &quot;Pepa&quot;, &quot;Sale&quot; and the two sons of a man called Avdo outside the hall. Ranko CESIC lined up and shot and killed the five detainees with bursts of gunfire. 	   SOURCE: International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia</description>
	 <source>International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:48:11 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>Indictment Against Milan Martic</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=20499</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=20499</guid>
		 <description>From on or about 1 August 1991 until 31 December 1995, Milan Martic, acting individually or in concert with other known and unknown members of a joint criminal enterprise, planned, instigated, ordered, committed, or otherwise aided and abetted the planning, preparation, or execution of the persecutions of the Croat, Muslim and other non-Serb civilian population in the SAO Krajina and city of Zagreb in Croatia, and in the Autonomous Region of Krajina (&quot;ARK&quot;) in Bosnia and Herzegovina, in particular in Bosanski Novi, Bosanska Gradiska, Prnjavor, and Sipovo. 	   SOURCE: International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia</description>
	 <source>International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:48:11 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>Indictment Against Dario Kordic, Mario Cerkez, Tihomir Blaskic, Ivica Santic, Pero Skopljak, and Zlatko Aleksovski</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=20500</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=20500</guid>
		 <description>Serious violations of international humanitarian law took place during the period of May 1992 to May 1993, when the armed forces of the Croatian Defence Council  attacked the Muslim civilian population in the towns, villages and hamlets of the Lasva Valley area of Central Bosnia generally and specifically in the municipalities of Vitez and Busovaca and the civilian population of the nearby city of Zenica, in the territory of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina. 	   SOURCE: International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia</description>
	 <source>International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:48:11 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>Indictment Against Dario Kordic and Mario Cerkez</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=20501</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=20501</guid>
		 <description>In his various high-ranking positions and through the power and influence that he exercised, Dario Kordic played a central role in developing, establishing and executing the policies, objectives and strategies of the HDZ-BiH, the HZ H-B, the HR H-B and the HVO. Along with others, he launched, planned, instigated, prepared, ordered, committed and aided and abetted a political-military campaign to persecute and terrorise Bosnian Muslims, which involved, or resulted in, the commission of serious violations of international humanitarian law.



As an HVO commander, Mario Cerkez implemented by military means the HDZ-BiH's, the HZ H-B's, the HR H-B's and HVO's goals, policies and objectives, and committed and aided and abetted the persecution campaign. He was the commander of the HVO Vitez Brigade, which was directly and actively involved in the wide-scale persecution against Bosnian Muslim civilians. 	   SOURCE: International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia</description>
	 <source>International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:48:11 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>Indictment Against Zoran Marinic</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=20502</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=20502</guid>
		 <description>On or about 26 April 1993 at Busovaca in Central Bosnia Herzegovina, Zoran MARINIC killed and participated in the killing of Sabrija Topalovic, Ahmet Topalovic, Adil Topalovic and Veda Smulo. 	   SOURCE: International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia</description>
	 <source>International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:48:11 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>Indictment Against Anto Furundzija</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=20503</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=20503</guid>
		 <description>From at least January 1993 through at least mid-July 1993, the HZ-BZ armed forces, known as the Croatian Defence Council (&quot;HVO&quot;), were engaged in an armed conflict with the armed forces of the government of the Republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina.



From the outset of hostilities in January 1993, the HVO attacked villages chiefly inhabited by Bosnian Muslims in the La{va River Valley region in Central Bosnia-Herzegovina. These attacks resulted in the death and wounding of numerous civilians.



In addition, other civilians were detained, transported from their places of residence, forced to perform manual labour, were tortured, subjected to sexual assaults, and other physical and mental abuse. Hundreds of Bosnian Muslim civilians were arrested by the HVO an#d taken to the locations such as the Vitez Cinema Complex and the Vitez Veterinary Station which were being used as detention facilities.



While imprisoned, numerous Bosnian Muslim prisoners were brought to the front lines where HVO soldiers forced them to dig protective trenches to protect HVO soldiers from being shot by BiH snipers. On several occasions Bosnian Muslim prisoners were killed and wounded while digging these protective trenches. 	   SOURCE: International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia</description>
	 <source>International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:48:03 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>Democratic Civil-Military Relations in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A New Paradigm for Protectorates?</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=20341</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=20341</guid>
		 <description>This article applies Cottey et al's thesis of first and second generation civil-military relations to the protectorate of Bosnia-Herzegovina. It argues that in the case of Bosnia-Herzegovina this agenda does not occur in a loosely overlapping fashion with the initiation of the first generation agenda providing the basis upon which the second-generation agenda can be implemented. Rather, the reverse occurs - the second generation capacity building agenda allows for the construction of state level institutions in the defence and security sphere - not least a functioning Ministry of Defence - which is the hallmark of the first generation macro-institutional structural reform agenda. This approach may well prove to be appropriate for other protectorates. It is of rising strategic significance in an age of pre-emptive action against failed and rogue states, regime change and democratization. 	   SOURCE: Conflict Studies Research Centre // Defence Academy of the United Kingdom</description>
	 <source>Conflict Studies Research Centre // Defence Academy of the United Kingdom</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:47:56 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>Justice Unknown, Justice Unsatisfied? Bosnian NGOs Speak about the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=20158</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=20158</guid>
		 <description>In 1993,the United Nations Security Council created the International Criminal Tribunal for

the Former Yugoslavia to bring to justice persons who had committed atrocities during the

recent war. By prosecuting individuals responsible for mass killings, systematic detention and

rape, and other serious violations of humanitarian law, they believed that the ICTY would

through its trials establish individual accountability and contribute to the &quot;restoration and maintenance

of peace&quot; in the former Yugoslavia.

This report will show that local non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in Bosnia and

Herzegovina - which work on a daily basis with issues related to the Tribunal - are not well

informed about the process of international justice and have many misconceptions about it.The

Tribunal, rather than being seen as bringing individual accountability, is inadvertently reinforcing

the same divisions that divided the country during the war. 	   SOURCE: Tufts University // Human Rights Data Analysis Group</description>
	 <source>Tufts University // Human Rights Data Analysis Group</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:47:56 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>From emergency to development: assessing UNDP's role in Bosnia and Herzegovina</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=20235</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=20235</guid>
		 <description>Since the Dayton Peace Accords of December 1995 ended three and a half years of conflict, UNDP has worked in Bosnia and Herzegovina to facilitate return of displaced people, consolidate peace and lay the basis for long-term development. 	   SOURCE: Forced Migration Review</description>
	 <source>Forced Migration Review</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:47:45 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>Study on Access to Rights and Reintegration of Displaced Population in Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=19973</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=19973</guid>
		 <description>This study was drafted by a regional network of human rights NGOs as part of a project to support the return of refugees/IDPs through legal aid. It was financially supported by the Government of the United States of America and implemented by the OSCE Mission to Serbia in co-operation with the OSCE Missions in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia. 	   SOURCE: Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe</description>
	 <source>Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:47:45 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>Post Conflict Assessment Unit (PCAU), United Nations Environment Program (UNEP)</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=20049</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=20049</guid>
		 <description>Established in 2001, the Post Conflict Assessment Unit (PCAU) assists countries and regions in the post-conflict recovery and reconstruction period. PCAU is currently active in Afghanistan, the former Yugoslavia, the Occupied Territories, and Iraq. Results from PCAU's post-conflict assessments are available on their website. For the PCAU's list of publications, click here. http://postconflict.unep.ch/publications.htm 

 	   SOURCE: </description>
	 <source></source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:47:45 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>Security Sector Reform in the Balkans: A Key to Ending Conflict</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=20067</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=20067</guid>
		 <description>Security Sector Reform (SSR)

is a specific peace-building

instrument which is part of

a much wider process of

transformation and stabilisation.

It is crucial for the authorities in

post-conflict societies to reform

their military (and paramilitary),

police, intelligence and border

control forces, customs and

judiciary to bring about lasting

change. Without substantial

reforms in these areas, it is almost

impossible to achieve sustainable

peace, democracy and development.

While this is true for many

war-torn communities and states,

it is particularly important for the

countries of the Western Balkans,

plagued as they are by the legacy

of wars, strained inter-ethnic

relations, unresolved status

issues, thriving criminal activities,

corrupt bureaucracies and high

unemployment rates. 	   SOURCE: European Policy Centre</description>
	 <source>European Policy Centre</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:47:44 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>The Post Conflict Security Sector</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=19797</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=19797</guid>
		 <description>This essay draws on a recent study of how the international community has dealt with the

need to construct or reconstruct the security sector in six countries where there has been

severe conflict leading to significant international engagement. Various factors are

identified as having been critical in shaping the outcome of (re)construction efforts, and

they are evaluated from several perspectives. The author observes that external actors

have tended to take a limited #and unbalanced approach to the security sector, focusing on

building the efficiency of statutory security actors, and neglecting the development of

managerial and governance capacity. He concludes that while programmes tended to

become more effective after the first major post-Cold War effort was undertaken in Haiti

in 1994, the plight of the reconstruction effort in Afghanistan after 2001 may point to a

reversal of this trend. 	   SOURCE: Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces</description>
	 <source>Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:47:44 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>Trafficking in Human Beings in South Eastern Europe </title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=19915</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=19915</guid>
		 <description>This report provides an overview of activities focused on the prevention of

trafficking in human beings in South Eastern Europe (SEE), and is designed to

supplement the information and analysis in two earlier joint UNICEF, UNOHCHR

and OSCE/ODIHR reports on trafficking in SEE published in 2002 and 2003.

The research was carried out in Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH), Bulgaria,

Croatia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYR Macedonia), Moldova,

Romania, Serbia and Montenegro, and the UN Administered Province of Kosovo

between January 2004 and March 2004. The report aims to fills gaps in the

previous reports by addressing the issue of prevention of trafficking in human

beings, including awareness raising and re-integration processes. 	   SOURCE: United Nations // United Nations Children's Fund // United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights // Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe // Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights</description>
	 <source>United Nations // United Nations Children's Fund // United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights // Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe // Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:47:43 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>International assistance to democratisation and reconciliation in Bosnia and Herzegovina</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=19756</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=19756</guid>
		 <description>The present study is a macro-level evaluation of international assistance to

democratisation and reconciliation in Bosnia and Herzegovina within the

framework of a multi-dimensional peace operation. The study was conducted

within the research project Democratisation and Reconciliation in Post-Intrastate

Conflict Situations. An Evaluation of the International Contributions to

Democratisation and Reconciliation in Bosnia-Herzegovina, Kosovo and Macedonia

1995-2004. The overarching research question for the project is: How do

international actors seek to assist the processes of democratisation and

reconciliation after violent inter-group conflicts?



The international actors analysed are the United Nations, the European

Union and the Organization for Security and Cooperation. In a micro analysis,

the means and goals of the actors regarding conflict prevention and and goals, and if so, how are these managed? The main achievements and

obstacles pertaining to democratisation and reconciliation in Bosnia and

Herzegovina are analysed in a macro-level impact evaluation.

democratisation are analysed. The analysis probe into the policy logic of the

actors, that is, reconstruct the perception of the actors on how democratisation

can be achieved.2 It elucidates the conflicting goals and means within and

between the missions and analyzes the management thereof. For the purpose of

analysis of the different missions, several issues are attended to: What are the

goals of the mandate? Who implements the mandate? How is the mandate

implemented? Are there conflicting goals or incompatibilities between means and goals, and if so, how are these managed? The main achievements and

obstacles pertaining to democratisation and reconciliation in Bosnia and

Herzegovina are analysed in a macro-level impact evaluation. 	   SOURCE: Uppsala University</description>
	 <source>Uppsala University</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:47:43 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>Swedish assistance to democratisation and reconciliation in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo and Macedonia</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=19757</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=19757</guid>
		 <description>Swedish involvement in the Western Balkans has been on a high level since the

wars broke out in 1991. The engagement includes military peace keeping and

post-conflict reform assistance. An important overall question is how the

Swedish contribution has functioned. More specifically, how is Swedish

assistance expected to have an impact on peace, democratisation and

reconciliation? Has the relationship between goals and means been

characterised by consistency? Are there conflicting goals? What can be said

about the obstacles and the difficulties for achieving these goals?

The aim of this report is twofold. A first ambition is to provide a general

picture of the Swedish development assistance, with the Western Balkans in

focus. However, the main purpose of the report involves examining the extent

to which the Swedish policy in the field of democratisation and reconciliation is

coherent with the programmes that are actually being carried out in the field.

This latter aim entails looking at impediments for efficient Swedish

development assistance as for democratisation and reconciliation. A further

ambition is to identify and analyse also other such hampering aspects for

effective democratisation and reconciliation assistance. The time period covered

in the report is 1995-2004. 	   SOURCE: Uppsala University</description>
	 <source>Uppsala University</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:47:42 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>International assistance to democratisation in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo and Macedonia</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=19755</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=19755</guid>
		 <description>Since the 1990s democratisation is also an integrated part of the

conflict prevention agenda. Multidimensional peace operations, also called

second generation peacekeeping, have become the model for contemporary

peace promotion. Postconflict peacebuilding is seen as the method for

addressing causes by social and political reconstruction. 



Democratisation is explicitly recognized as a

mechanism for conflict prevention.

However, researchers and donors have in recent years identified a

fundamental paradox. While democracy as a political system is associated with

peaceful conflict management, the risk of violent conflict, within and between

states, rises sharply during the process of democratisation. This means that democracy promotion may

exacerbate the risk of violent conflict. Hence, international efforts for

democratisation are not always compatible with the goal of conflict prevention,

at least not in the short-term. This is the starting point for the present project. 	   SOURCE: Uppsala University</description>
	 <source>Uppsala University</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:47:40 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>Holding States Accountable for the Ultimate Human Rights Abuse: A Review of the International Court of Justice's Bosnian Genocide Case</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=19746</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=19746</guid>
		 <description>What is genocide? Can a state be held responsible for

its commission? What affirmative obligations do

states have to prevent genocide? The International

Court of Justice (ICJ) offered new answers to these

perennial questions on February 26, 2007, in Application of the

Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of

Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro)

(Bosnian Genocide). The Bosnian Genocide Court held that: (1)

Serbia violated its obligations under the Convention on the

Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Genocide

Convention) to prevent genocide in Srebrenica2 (the largest mass

murder in Europe since World War II), but did not have the requisite

specific intent to commit genocide; and (2) Serbia must fully

cooperate with the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former

Yugoslavia (ICTY). While clarifying state accountability, the decision

has raised fundamental questions regarding the proliferation

of tribunals in international law, and the extent to which states

now have affirmative obligations to prevent genocide. 	   SOURCE: Human Rights Brief</description>
	 <source>Human Rights Brief</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:47:34 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>The Dayton Peace Accords Project</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=19593</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=19593</guid>
		 <description>The Dayton Peace Accords Project assists post-conflict parties in developing practical solutions to issues of peace implementation, constitutional development, institution building, economic development, and cultural and ethnic heritage through the provision of appropriate and time technical, legal, and advocacy assistance. 	   SOURCE: Tufts University</description>
	 <source>Tufts University</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:47:34 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>From Dayton to Brussels: The Story Behind the Constitutional and Governmental Reform Process in Bosnia and Herzegovina</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=19594</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=19594</guid>
		 <description>This article describes the participation of the Dayton Project in a constitutional and governmental reform process supported by the international community that began in February 2005 and involved the government of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the eight major political parties in Parliament. 	   SOURCE: Dayton Peace Accords Project</description>
	 <source>Dayton Peace Accords Project</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:47:34 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>The Process and Prospect of the Constitutional Reform Process in Bosnia and Herzegovina</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=19595</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=19595</guid>
		 <description>This paper describes

the process behind the constitutional and governmental reform process that began in February

2005 and involved the government of Bosnia and Herzegovina (BH) and the eight major political

parties in Parliament. It also briefly assesses the problems surrounding the process and the

prospective future of the Process. 	   SOURCE: Dayton Peace Accords Project</description>
	 <source>Dayton Peace Accords Project</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:47:34 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>Update Report on Bosnia-Herzegovina (14 May 2007)</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=19639</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=19639</guid>
		 <description>On 16 May the Council is scheduled to be briefed by the High Representative for the Implementation of the Peace Agreement in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Christian Schwarz-Schilling. A discussion of his most recent report will follow.  Of concern to the Council will be Bosnia and Herzegovina's constitutional reform, the adoption of a unified police force and full cooperation with the ICTY. The Council may issue a press statement after the debate.  Any other action is unlikely as there is nothing the Council needs to authorise or endorse at this stage. 	   SOURCE: Security Council Report</description>
	 <source>Security Council Report</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:47:20 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>Grassroots efforts to prevent and resolve violence </title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=19299</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=19299</guid>
		 <description>

On the eve of the first global civil society conference on preventing violent conflict, being hosted by the UN in July 2005, this report is intended to stimulate debate about the power and possibility of grassroots peace-builders to make a lasting difference. It gathers peacebuilding experiences from six countries where World Vision works: Serbia and Montenegro (Kosovo), Colombia, Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Bosnia &amp; Herzegovina, and Sierra Leone

 	   SOURCE: World Vision International</description>
	 <source>World Vision International</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:47:20 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>Bosnia's Stalled Police Reform: No Progress, No EU</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=19391</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=19391</guid>
		 <description>International strategy for Bosnia will derail unless the key obstacles to police reform -- the Serbian Democratic Party (SDS) and Belgrade -- are confronted in the few weeks before the EU decides whether to start key integration negotiations. Efforts to push police reform that satisfies EU criteria have failed due to Serbian obstruction. The international community needs to make clear there will be no negotiations until there is serious reform; it will ban the SDS unless there is reform; and it will put heavy pressure on Belgrade both to give up its Greater Serbia territorial aspirations and use its influence to support reform. If police reform is left unfinished, ethnic chieftains will retain control of the instruments of state violence, and the potential for new hostilities will remain. 	   SOURCE: International Crisis Group</description>
	 <source>International Crisis Group</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:47:04 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>EU Military Operation in Bosnia and Herzegovina (EUFOR - Althea)</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=19043</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=19043</guid>
		 <description>The Council of the European Union decided on 12 July 2004 (Council Joint Action 2004/570/CFSP of 12 July 2004) to conduct a military operation in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) in the framework of the European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP). The decision by the EU to launch ALTHEA follows the decision by NATO to conclude its SFOR-operation. Operation ALTHEA will be carried out with recourse to NATO assets and capabilities, on the basis agreed with NATO (&quot;Berlin Plus&quot;).



The aim is to deploy by the end of the year a robust force (EUFOR) - starting at the same force levels as NATO-led SFOR (7,000 troops) - with a Chapter VII mission to ensure continued compliance with the Dayton/Paris Agreement and to contribute to a safe and secure environment in BiH. 	   SOURCE: Council of the European Union</description>
	 <source>Council of the European Union</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:47:04 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>EUFOR-IA: Changing Bosnia's Security Arrangements</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=19044</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=19044</guid>
		 <description>The announcement that the EU will take over from NATO in Bosnia is politically popular in Washington and Brussels but the success of the new security set-up cannot be taken for granted. The planned EU-led peacekeeping force (EUFOR), which will replace NATO's Stabilisation Force (SFOR) by the end of 2004, arrives at a delicate time for the Balkans. The region faces increased security challenges on a variety of fronts, and EUFOR's mandate has to reflect this new reality. The main security challenges today are weapons smuggling, the apprehension of war criminals, extremist religious groups, and border security. There are questions about whether the cash-strapped and far-from-integrated armies of the EU member states can meet these challenges. This will be the most significant change in the international presence in Bosnia since the war ended, and significant post-war achievements are at stake. 	   SOURCE: International Crisis Group</description>
	 <source>International Crisis Group</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:47:04 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>A Chance for Justice? War Crime Prosecutions in Bosnia's Serb Republic</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=19053</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=19053</guid>
		 <description>Based on the research conducted for this report, Human Rights Watch believes that there are several measures that can be taken to help ensure the trials are consistent with international standards. They include the introduction of professional investigators in the prosecutorial offices at the district level, and an increase in the number of prosecutors where the increased number of war crimes investigations so requires. Prosecutorial offices should also make greater use of law clerks in war crimes prosecutions, and make full use of available sources of information relevant to the investigation, including information gathered by nongovernmental organizations, and ICTY transcripts and other material. 	   SOURCE: Human Rights Watch</description>
	 <source>Human Rights Watch</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:47:03 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>Srebrenica timeline</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=18834</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=18834</guid>
		 <description>In the summer of 1995, two years after it was designated a United Nations Safe Area, the Bosnian town of Srebrenica became the scene of the worst massacre in the Bosnian war. This is an account of the critical days leading up to the killings. 	   SOURCE: British Broadcasting Corporation</description>
	 <source>British Broadcasting Corporation</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:47:03 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>Gender Aspects of Conflict Interventions: Intended and Unintended Consequences</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=18870</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=18870</guid>
		 <description>This report is a study of how gender dimensions shape and are shaped by international conflict interventions. Through case studies the report investigates ways in which the interventions have intended and unitended gender consequences. The report makes policy recommendations based on the analysis. 	   SOURCE: International Peace Research Institute, Oslo</description>
	 <source>International Peace Research Institute, Oslo</source>
		 </item>
	   <item>
	   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:47:03 -0700</pubDate>
	 <title>Emergency Obstetric Care: Critical Need among Populations Affected by Armed Conflict</title>
	   <link>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=18873</link>
	   <guid>http://www.humansecuritygateway.com/showRecord.php?RecordId=18873</guid>
		 <description> 	   SOURCE: Women's Commission for Refugee Women and Children // Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium</description>
	 <source>Women's Commission for Refugee Women and Children // Reproductive Health Response in Conflict Consortium</source>
		 </item>
	

</channel>

</rss>
